Archive for November, 2008

The Case For Synthetic Diamonds In Wheel Dressing Tools

November 29th 2008

Synthetic-diamond dressing tools are often a superior alternative to natural-diamond dressing tools for conditioning a grinding wheel. The reason is the consistency that the synthetic-diamond tools bring to the process. That is a key point in the case for synthetic diamond dressing tools made by William D. James, a product engineer in the stationary tool group at Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Worcester, Massachusetts).

According to Mr. James, synthetic tool stones start out as more consistent products because the manufacturing process that creates them is tightly controlled and predictable. Synthetic stones are available in a variety of close-tolerance sizes, are longer than most elongated natural stones and have a uniform rectangular shape through their entire length. As he explains, all dressing tool diamonds (natural or synthetic) develop wear flats over time. With natural diamonds, problems begin as wear flats increase in size and eventually become too big to sharpen the wheel. Instead of opening the wheel’s grain structure, the dressing tool closes it, leaving the wheel dull. Synthetic diamonds are consistently shaped so that their wear flats never get large enough for this to happen.

This “non-dulling” property means that synthetic stones never need indexing as natural stones do. Likewise, the longer synthetic stones simply outlast the shorter natural diamonds. For these reasons, using synthetic-diamond dressing tools avoids two causes of machine downtime—interruptions for indexing the tool or replacing it outright.

Mr. James identifies six steps for transitioning to synthetic-diamond dressing tools:

1. Choose between monocrystalline and CVD (chemical vapor deposition) diamonds. Both types work well, but the monocrystalline stones tend to be more durable (and a little more expensive).
2. Specify the correct diamond size and shape. These must be matched to the specific grinding application.
3. Decide how many stones to use. Unlike single-point natural-diamond tools, an equivalent synthetic-diamond tool may have as many as five stones or more mounted in a blade-like configuration. Generally, the larger the wheel size, the more stones are needed to dress it.
4. Be sure the individual diamond stones are oriented correctly. They must be angled up for general use and straight on for heavy-duty applications.
5. Configure the tool properly. Blade configurations with multiple stones must be mounted vertically so that the wheel sees only one diamond width as the tool moves across the wheel.
6. Use appropriate dressing parameters and stick to them. Synthetic tools use the same parameters as those for natural-diamond tools, but synthetic tools weaken faster if overheated because recommended speeds and feeds are exceeded.

Mr. James concludes that whether you’re considering the use of synthetic diamonds to improve wheel-conditioning consistency or to eliminate downtime associated with having operators interrupt production to index the diamonds, synthetic dressing tools have much to offer.

http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/the-case-for-synthetic-diamonds-in-wheel-dressing-tools.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Tools | No Comments »

Remote CNC Access And Operation

November 29th 2008

Remote Machining melds two seemingly antithetical concepts—control and freedom—so that shops can do some reconnaissance work or tweak parameters on their own terms. The manufacturer’s self-titled, all-hardware interface grants real-time access to all CNC functions via the Internet so that shop personnel can manipulate the process, regardless of their proximity to the actual machine.

Operators can edit programs, check cut progression or troubleshoot from any PC—be it in a hotel lobby or a home office—as long as there is Internet connectivity. The interface assuages logistical concerns for the user without taxing the machine’s brainpower. It consists of an adapter and a centralized controller, which are completely independent of software, operating system or controller type. The virtual “spy” does not encumber the CNC. Rather, it gains access by splicing into the I/O from the controller side. In essence, the machine is not even cognizant of this “spy.”

“The product is piggybacking, not taxing the control with extra functions,” explains Tim Zott, president of Remote Machining (West Bloomfield, Michigan).

The product is compatible with machining centers, grinding machines, lasers, lathes, plasma cutters, waterjets, EDMs and other CNC-controlled machines. Thus far, it has been predominantly adopted in EDMs because they are generally run unattended more frequently than other machines. Makino offers the interface as a third-party option for its wire and ram EDMs.

Basic shopfloor requirements are at least one PC with Internet connectivity in the building and a LAN connection (within cabling distance) to the machine. Shop personnel can log on to their company’s own internal infrastructure to tinker with certain parameters and functions, but in such a way that does not interfere with the integrity of the process. All modifications must be in accordance with OSHA regulations, which stipulate that axes cannot move without an interlock system. Thus, Mr. Zott says, users can’t execute changes that cause direct movement of the cutting axes outside of what is specified in the loaded program. They can, however, check in periodically to see if alarms have been triggered or to gauge overall machining efficiencies and possibly make adjustments.

“With EDMs, for instance, the shop could modify cutting parameters remotely,” explains Brian Pfluger, Makino senior applications engineer. “Although it can’t start the machine, the shop could edit the speeds and feeds and power elements, as well as halt production.”

From an application support standpoint, the product can better equip engineers to bridge the gap between perceptions of what is going on with the reality of what is actually occurring at the machine. Mr. Pfluger says the system is beneficial when providing technical assistance and when training new users, especially during the first year of machine ownership.

“This often helps us make machining adjustments so that the customer’s part is running more efficiently,” he comments.

This first year of ownership, Mr. Zott says, typically represents the highest incurrence of costs related to technical services and support as well as machine downtime. This product can ease some of those expenses.

“Now, a 15-minute conversation might suffice instead of the lengthy and often frequent exchanges between the application engineers and new machine users,” he says. “The manufacturer’s engineer need only log-in through a secure access port to view the CNC screen and adjust parameters—all of this can be done live with the machine operator logged on as well.”

http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/remote-cnc-access-and-operation.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Machines | No Comments »

Synthetic-Diamond Dressing Tools: Why Not Use Them?

November 29th 2008

What you have heard is true. The more consistent a stationary dressing tool is, the more consistent the grinding. By design, dressing tools with synthetic diamonds can provide a level of wheel consistency few other types of stationary dressing tools offer. While synthetic-diamond dressing tools are not “end-all” products designed to replace natural-diamond tools, they do offer an alternative that takes consistency and productivity in wheel conditioning to a whole new level. Whether you are thinking about trying synthetic-diamond tools or hearing about them for the first time, there are a few things you’ll need to know to use them effectively.
Comparing Synthetics To Natural Tool Stones

Just how do synthetic tool stones differ from natural diamonds?

* Synthetic diamonds are available in a variety of close-tolerance sizes and lengths, whereas natural diamonds tend to mimic one of five basic shapes.
* Synthetics are produced under tightly controlled conditions for consistency to avoid internal imperfections normally associated with natural diamonds.
* Rectangular synthetic stones, often called logs or rods, are longer than most natural elongated stones, giving them a significant life advantage.
* Rectangular synthetic diamonds are consistently shaped their entire length. This ensures consistent wheel conditioning for the entire length of the stone. As noted below, when natural stones wear down, so does their ability to condition the grinding wheel.

What Is It About Synthetics?

It may be difficult to see at first, but over time, dressing-tool diamonds develop wear flats. With natural diamonds, problems begin as wear flats increase in size and eventually become too big. The exact point at which this excessive wear occurs is known as the transition point. Once a wear flat passes the transition point in size, the tool becomes dull and, in turn, it dulls the wheel (that is, closes its porosity) rather than sharpens the wheel (that is, opens its porosity). Synthetic diamonds are consistently shaped so that their wear flats never get larger. This feature gives them a significant advantage because they will never transform sharp wheels into dull ones, as natural stones do.
Improving Productivity

Unlike natural-diamond tools, synthetic-diamond tools never require indexing (rotating) to keep their wear flats from growing too large too fast. So, an operator using a synthetic-diamond tool no longer has to interrupt production to index the tool in order to keep the wear flats from growing too large. Of course, operating without indexing reduces downtime and thereby increases productivity. Additional productivity gains occur because longer synthetic diamonds simply outlast short natural diamonds, thus reducing tool changes and subsequent CNC machine touch-offs.

Synthetic diamond grows shorter with use and not larger in contact area (wear flat diameter) to the wheel. Consequently, synthetic diamonds can be used effectively until they are quite short—shorter than a natural diamond could ever be. Most manual and CNC grinding machines can readily adjust for diamond tools wearing shorter, whereas few have automatic diamond-tool indexers to maintain wear flat sizes.

Synthetic tools can also be marked at the factory with diamond depth lines. This feature allows operators to forecast diamond life and change worn tools at the beginning of large production runs, thereby avoiding unnecessary production interruptions for tool changeovers.
Specifics On synthetics

Synthetic diamonds are rectangular in shape. However, when they are mounted in tools with only the ends visible, they appear square. The square shapes are used to size the stone for use in a tool. Application specifics such as wheel size, wheel shape, machine type and so on are important factors in specifying a diamond size. The diamond selected is typically the largest (square shape) that does not exceed the size of the transition point. See Figure 1.
The Availability Of Synthetic Tools

With some minor physical modifications, most tool types can be made with synthetic diamonds. Synthetic tools are configured a bit differently in certain situations to favor the rectangular shape of the tool stones. The most popular synthetic tools are blade tools with multiple stones. However, as interest in synthetic-diamond tools grows, so does interest in single points, chisels and diaform configurations. Interestingly, synthetic tools can be configured to dress opposing corner radii in a single pass with CNC. That procedure is something natural-diamond tools have trouble performing.
Six Steps To Getting Started

Once you’ve made the decision to try synthetic-diamond dressing tools, these six steps will help you make the transition successfully:

Selecting a synthetic diamond type
There are two popular synthetic diamond types used in dressing tools; monocrystalline and CVD (chemical vapor disposition). Both work well for truing and dressing conventional grinding wheels.

Monocrystalline diamond, as the name implies, is grown from a single (mono) crystal into a large form, and is then cut into specific shapes for use in dressing tools. Monocrystalline diamonds are easily recognized by their uniform appearance and greenish-yellow color. Testing has revealed that in dressing applications, monocrystalline diamonds are the more durable and more expensive of the two synthetics.

CVD diamonds are produced using a special manufacturing process that creates diamond crystals from a chemical vapor. Once formed, this material is cut into smaller sizes for use in dressing tools. CVD diamonds are uniformly shaped and easily recognized by their black color.

Specifying diamond size and shape
The process of selecting natural-diamond tool-stone sizes and shapes for use in dressing tools is based upon important application specifics such as grinding tolerances, grinding wheel size and abrasive type. This same application information is just as important when selecting synthetic diamonds. However, the process used in selecting the diamonds is very different. Both the size (cross-sectional area) and the length of a diamond are important.

Most diamond tool manufacturers offer a range of synthetic diamonds in 0.4 mm-, 0.6 mm-, 0.8 mm- and 1.0 mm-square sizes. The lengths of the square shaped stones range from 3 mm to 5 mm. The most common length is 3 mm.

Deciding how many stones to use
Unlike operations using natural-diamond tools, in which a single stone is often used, an equivalent synthetic tool may use up to five synthetic stones mounted in a blade. The recommended number of stones will vary by application and is derived directly from the application specifics, which include wheel specifications and finish requirements. As a general rule, the larger the wheel size, the larger the number of synthetic stones that are required and the larger those stones will have to be. Either follow the guidelines shown in Table 1 or contact a Saint-Gobain diamond-tool application engineer for assistance.

Table 1–Synthetic Stone Selection Guidelines

Grinding wheel
diameter*
Recommended number
of stones

‹ 11 inches (‹ 279mm)
1

12 – 17 inches (304 – 431mm)
2

18 – 29 inches (457 – 736mm)
3-4

30 – 36 inches (737 -914mm)
5

*For wheel widths › 6 inches, add a stone

Specifying diamond orientation
When using synthetic diamonds, the orientation of the square-shaped stone plays a very important role in tool performance. Misaligned or poorly oriented stones can negatively impact your ability to achieve optimum wheel conditioning. In general, set the diamond(s) angled or diagonal (as shown ). For heavy-duty applications, rotate the diamond(s) 45 degrees () as needed.

Getting the tool configured correctly
Don’t be locked into existing tool designs. Many conversions to synthetic tools require a slightly different tool configuration, which often ends up being a blade tool. These modifications are often necessary because of the differences between natural and synthetic diamonds. For example, multiple stones should be mounted vertically on blade configurations so only one diamond width makes contact as the tool moves across the wheel. It is also important that the shank orient the diamonds so that the stones are aligned perpendicular to the wheel face as shown in the box, “Tech Tips.”

Using synthetic tools correctly
Operate synthetic dressing tools using the same dressing parameters you use for natural-diamond tools. One word of caution: when overheated, synthetic diamonds tend to weaken faster than natural diamonds. Operators using synthetic tools should be disciplined and not exceed the recommended diamond dressing tool speeds and feeds.
Synthetics Are Worth Considering

Whether you’re considering the use of synthetic diamonds to improve wheel-conditioning consistency or to avoid interrupting production to index the diamonds, synthetic dressing tools have much to offer. As mentioned earlier, synthetic dressing tools will not bring an end to the use of natural-diamond tools. However, synthetics are desirable in certain applications and suitable for use in many different tools types.

Getting started is not all that difficult if you follow the steps outlined above.
http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/synthetic-diamond-dressing-tools-why-not-use-them.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Machining | No Comments »

Mold Maker Cuts Delivery Times With CAD/CAM

November 28th 2008

PROBLEM: Needed to reduce turnaround time on prototype molds to stay competitive

SOLUTION : PowerMill CAM software from Delcam

RESULTS: Reduced programming time, quicker deliveries

Hitech Shapes & Designs, a division of Seilkop Industries in Cincinnati, Ohio, has been building foundry tooling since 1946. Since then, Hitech has kept up with new manufacturing technology, evolving from hand-crafted wood and metal patterns to CNC capability. Staying on the cutting edge is not just beneficial for the company, but essential—most of its customers work in the automotive industry and demand quick turnaround.

As part of its ongoing effort to stay competitive and meet delivery targets, the company invested in a CAD/CAM package from Delcam that reduced both programming and machining time by approximately 25 percent. In addition, the software was easy to learn, according to CAD operator Les Wright. “With only five half-day classes, I was up and going with it,” he says.

Hitech specializes in the design and prototyping of automatic molding tooling for casting. Frequently starting out with a raw chunk of material, the company uses its six three-axis mills and two CNC lathes to cut aluminum, iron, plastics, urethane, tool steel and even wood. It works closely with customer design teams to streamline production processes, and it helps anticipate changes required for the casting process through solid model transfer. The shop imports solid models from customers or creates them from paper drawings using PTC’s Pro/Engineer design software. After completing pattern tooling design, Mr. Wright uses Delcam software to create programs derived directly from customers’ solid model files.

PowerShape, Delcam’s CAD application, provides various strategies for constructing a surface from a given set of lines, arcs or points. Smart Surfacing capability enables the software to automatically choose the method that will provide the smoothest possible surface. Additionally, this feature automatically updates the software’s selection when information is added to the design. As additional points or lines are inserted into the model, PowerShape reviews the chosen surfacing method and regenerates the surface with an alternate solution if a better one exists.
Once the file is imported into the PowerMill CAM application, this makes it easy to program the machining in layers to suit the lengths of the company’s cutters, Mr. Wright says. “Programming in layers allows us to program the machining efficiently and avoid cutting air,” he adds. “This saves all kinds of time, which is important to our success.”
Mr. Wright says one important benefit of PowerMill is the software’s automatic corner finishing capability. This feature allows the use of larger cutters when possible before switching to smaller tools for corner finishing. In contrast, the company’s previous software often called for machining an entire part with a small cutter just to access a tight corner. Additionally, programmers often had to create splines around each small corner to clean it out. “PowerMill does that automatically,” Mr. Wright says. “The cutters machine only where they are needed to clean up corners. The result is a more correct pattern in less time.”

Compared with the previous software, this function alone has reduced both programming time and finish machining time by approximately 25 percent. Hitech says the software helps save time in another way as well—it enables the company to cut a pattern out of solid material rather than first working with a molded part made from a master pattern. To ensure safe machining, the software automatically checks for potential cutting tool collisions. Meanwhile, contact-point analysis ensures that only the cutting edges touch the pattern or prototype part.

Also, Mr. Wright says PowerMill is more efficient than the previous software when programming high speed tool paths. Most of the shop’s machines use 15,000-rpm spindles, and with a 1.25-inch cutter, operators can achieve feed rates as fast as 300 ipm. “The key is that it does not make any sharp turns, but arcs in and arcs out, which is easier on the machine and tooling when moving at high speeds and feeds,” Mr. Wright says.

Once a prototype casting is delivered and evaluated by the customer, its file can be changed and returned to Hitech. Mr. Wright can overlay the 3D model from the customer and see any changes in the new casting file he gets back. He can select the areas of a pattern that need cutting and modify the file so that the machine will concentrate only on the area of concern, saving time in reprogramming and machining.

The ability to go from a solid model to an accurate machining program has cut turnaround time in half. Deliveries that typically took 12 weeks with the previous software, for example, now might take as little as 8 weeks. In addition, the software’s machining strategies help avoid cutting air, so machine time is chip-making time. The result is that the entire pattern-making cycle is 25-percent faster than before. A pattern that used to take the company 12 hours to program and machine can now be completed in less than 8 hours.

Posted by admin under CNC Machining | No Comments »

CAM System Simplifies Tire Mold Programming

November 28th 2008

PROBLEM: Segmented tire molds required complex, time-consuming programming

SOLUTION: HyperMill CAD software from Open Mind

RESULTS: Improved delivery time, part quality

Chris Sipe, owner of Northeast Tire Molds in Akron, Ohio, likens machining tire molds to evolutionary theory—while some firms go out on a branch and never go any higher, others can look a little further down the road and adapt to changing conditions. Mr. Sipe says his company is one of the latter. Having machined tire molds for more than 30 years, Northeast has moved from the traditional model of machining two-piece tire shell molds from castings to machining segmented molds directly from aluminum stock. Business has doubled during the past 2 years as a result.
A key component of this transition was hyperMill, a CAM package developed by Open Mind Technologies. Tire molds are extremely complex, with numerous 3D contours and cavities, and this creates a significant programming challenge. In his evaluation of the software, Mr. Sipe found that one programmer using hyperMill required only 3 months to accomplish the same amount of work that took a year with the company’s previous system. Along with an investment in the simultaneous five-axis machine tools and associated tooling needed for such work, the software has enabled Northeast to provide higher-quality products and faster delivery.

For many years, the standard in tire manufacturing has been two-piece shell molds. Uncured (or “green”) tires consist of layers of inner liners, tire cord fabrics, steel, Kevlar and extruded rubber. The green tires are placed into a press where the upper and lower mold sections meet. Heat energy creates chemical reactions to cure and bind the rubber, steel and fabric layers. Meanwhile, pneumatic bladders inflate to expand the tire against the mold and impart the tread design and required sidewall engraving. Post-press requirements can include dimension checks, X-ray inspections and other section analysis.

However, deforming and shaping a green tire within the contour of a two-piece mold can cause the rubber to move, affecting thickness conformity throughout the tread. On the other hand, segmented molds consisting of 7 to 10 sections with separate sidewall plates can decrease this movement and improve overall tire performance. The downside is that segmented molds take longer to cast, machine and finish, significantly increasing costs.

Although direct-machining techniques debuted in the 1960s, the process was complex, time-consuming and expensive. The advent of five-axis machine tools and 3D CAD models excited many mold builders, but significantly attacking lead time remained a struggle. “Tire molds require a very high standard of five-axis simultaneous methods,” says Mike Christie, Northeast Tire Molds vice president and a 15-year veteran of the company. “We believed in the idea of eliminating castings and direct-machining tire molds from stock, but unfortunately, the programming efforts were immense. And with segmented molds, the same problems repeated themselves in many locations.”

To eliminate castings, Northeast needed simultaneous five-axis machine tools, tooling and programming capabilities that would allow it to machine the molds directly from stock. Procuring such a package, however, took years of education and experience. “We wanted to be self-sufficient,” Mr. Sipe says. “We didn’t have a foundry, and we couldn’t control our costs with outside vendors, so we sought capital equipment where the model didn’t matter.”

Mr. Sipe found one piece of the package at the 2001 EMO show in Hannover, Germany: a five-axis Alzmetall milling machine. “You could purchase three other five-axis machines for the price of one Alzmetall, but you’re not getting three times more capacity,” he says. By 2005, he was ready to take delivery, but not without the programming wherewithal.
One advantage of segmented molds often touted by tire makers is that if a particular tread problem exists, they can correct one segment without recasting the entire mold. However, Northeast found itself writing its own lengthy routines to repeat programs in various mold locations. The company tried to use the same five-axis CAM software used by one of its major customers, but the results were a “nightmare,” Mr. Christie says. All data, including intermediate results, went into one big file, which frequently became too large to handle correctly. Programmers often found themselves waiting a half-hour or longer just to open files.

Believing it had a state-of-the-art system, Northeast gave itself 9 months to learn the programming before taking delivery on the new five-axis machine. Still, the company made little progress. “We were told by experienced people what we could and couldn’t do,” Mr. Christie says. “The amount of time invested to get the end result was astronomical.”

Faced with these difficulties, Mr. Sipe recalled talking to Open Mind Technologies at EMO 2005 about tire mold programming. When he decided to evaluate hyperMill, Open Mind’s CAM system, he found it had a number of advantages over the company’s current system and decided to implement the software in the shop. “We had automatic indexing and collision checking, which we didn’t have before,” Mr. Christie says. “We were able to model the entire machine in hyperMill, and everything is interrelated. Our old package wouldn’t let us check back.”
The software also can quickly handle the large amount of data, and it enables parametric modeling through CAD interfaces. Other features include global swarf machining; stock trimming and stop surfaces in five-axis strategies; associative programming; automation through macros from 2D to five-axis in the same package; and 2D through five-axis program generation via the same postprocessor.

In addition, the software offers a tire-specific package in which all 2D, 3D and five-axis strategies are expanded by a parameter that allows the user to assign a pitch to each machining strategy. This makes segments composed of a specified pattern of pitches easier to produce. Automated segment generation not only assigns NC tool paths to the corresponding mold segments, but also adjusts tool paths that go beyond segment boundaries.

With the right machine tools, tooling and programming support, Northeast Tire Molds is now reaping the rewards of multitasking. The shop has moved from performing as many as eight operations on various machines to loading raw material and proceeding to the finished part on a single machine with no subsequent benchwork. For an average tread, the company can deliver a mold in the time it used to take to get the casting. Mold quality has also proved. “Customers find their molds are lasting longer, and the quicker delivery time means we have more time for testing new things,” Mr. Sipe says. “Business has doubled in the last 2 years, and the amount we’ve advanced in the last 6 months makes it very exciting to envision next year.”
http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/cam-system-simplifies-tire-mold-programming.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Control & CNC Software | No Comments »

Alternate Tool Material For Hogging Large Workpieces

November 28th 2008

Attaining high metal-removal rates is a priority for many manufacturers, especially those serving the aerospace and moldmaking industries. Although carbide and high speed steel (HSS) cutting tools are popular for roughing applications on the large components common to such shops, both have disadvantages, notes Ivan Salazar, marketing manager for Santa Fe, California-based Precision Cutting Tools (PCT). He says roughing with carbide tools can be difficult because carbide can be somewhat brittle, chipping and breaking at high feeds and speeds. And while HSS is less prone to chipping, it can soften and wear at the high temperatures generated by heavy cuts, especially in applications involving titanium and other exotic alloys that have low heat-transfer rates.

PCT offers another alternative. Mr. Salazar says powder metal tools combine the best features of carbide and HSS. According to Mr. Salazar, powder metal can outperform both materials in rough-milling applications where the goal is to hog out as much metal as possible as quickly as possible.

Compared with HSS, powder metal provides higher heat and wear resistance, lasts longer and is only moderately more expensive, Mr. Salazar explains. Carbide, on the other hand, is harder than powder metal, making it the better choice for finishing applications in which the goal is to produce the smoothest possible surface. However, carbide’s extreme hardness makes it more susceptible to shock. Powder metal is more flexible, allowing users to run at higher feeds and speeds without worrying as much about breaking the tool. Additionally, powder metal tools are less expensive than their carbide counterparts, Mr. Salazar says.

Powder metal’s advantages stem primarily from the fact that its composition is designed to reach a fine balance between hardness (the material’s resistance to chipping or breakage) and toughness (the material’s resistance to gradual wear). Each tool consists of a soft matrix that acts like a glue to hold carbide cutting particles together, says Dave Reau, PCT’s quality control manager. Because the matrix is softer than the carbide particles, the volume of matrix versus the volume of carbide determines the tool’s hardness and toughness characteristics.

Powder metal tools are less brittle than their carbide counterparts because the matrix volume is greater than the carbide volume, while this relationship is reversed in most carbide tools, Mr. Reau notes. He says the tools are more wear-resistant than their HSS counterparts because the carbide particles are more uniformly distributed. This is beneficial because fractures can move through the tool more readily if the carbide particles are aligned, which is common in conventional HSS, he adds.

“Under a microscope, powder metal looks like sand—it mixes together quite finely.” Mr. Salazar explains. “Conventional HSS, on the other hand, looks like veins of wood. It’s not quite as compressed and not quite as homogenous.”

Powder metal tools can be used for workpieces ranging from aluminum mold cavities to large aerospace components made of titanium, Waspalloy, Hastalloy and other exotic alloys. Materials in the powder mixture are carefully proportioned according to each tool’s intended application. For example, PCT’s PM 30 and PM 60 series contain higher percentages of cobalt for machining hard materials, whereas the company’s PM 4 line includes more vanadium for aluminum workpieces.

http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/alternate-tool-material-for-hogging-large-workpieces.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Machining | No Comments »

Turning The Tough Stuff

November 28th 2008

Gentz Industries, in Warren, Michigan, is one of those shops that some suppliers love to have as a customer while others do not. Having Gentz as a good customer will make a supplier better—and all of its other customers will benefit, as well.

Gentz might be called “challenging.” However, meeting challenges is the best way to get stronger. It’s not that the company is “difficult” or “demanding” or “always driving a hard bargain.” On the contrary, it is remarkably open, cooperative and fair. The issue is that Gentz is dedicated to some uniquely challenging production requirements in aerospace and power generation. Fabricating complex turbine engine components for the commercial and military marketplace is a major part of its business. These components include combustion cases, high-pressure turbine housings and exhaust casings. In addition to CNC machining processes such as turning, milling and electrical discharge machining, the shop has extensive expertise in forming sheet metal using hydraulic presses, laser cutting, waterjet cutting, hydro-forming and other processes. Perhaps its most outstanding capability is assembling numerous machined and formed pieces into finished products using TIG welding, electron beam welding, vacuum furnace brazing and other advanced joining techniques.

Needless to say, quality requirements for jet engine components are extremely stringent, and meeting these requirements is Gentz’s top priority—the shop’s reputation in the industry hinges on it. Other top concerns are efficiency and cost control, which determine the shop’s profitability.

It is noteworthy that in the past couple of years, Gentz has changed its approach to buying cutting tools. In the same period, it has also changed its philosophy about investing in machine tools. These changes are one reason why the company manages to continually cut machining time, reduce setups and minimize part handling while consistently hitting quality and cost targets. Interestingly, Gentz is spending more on specially developed inserts and customized toolholder styles, while it has moved away from buying expensive, high-end machine tools. In both cases, however, this reflects that the company has become more value-conscious.

Being value-conscious when it comes to cutting tool spending as well as to investing in machine tools makes a big difference. This company buys a lot of cutting tools. According to Mark McWilliams, purchasing manager, the shop spends about $1.25 million a year on carbide inserts. Gentz has also been buying quite a few machine tools, especially in the last year or so as it ramped up for production of the turbine case for the Pratt & Whitney 150 jet engine. Since the beginning of 2007, the company has installed 10 new CNC machine tools.

To get the most out of its spending on carbide inserts and related cutting tool products, Gentz has developed a very unusual approach to working with its main cutting tool supplier, Seco Tools (Troy, Michigan), and Seco’s local distributor, E & R Industrial. The shop conducts monthly forums in which it presents its most pressing machining challenges to these suppliers. These forums have had notable success in turning applications, although milling has also benefited.

Although the new philosophy that Gentz is following in machine tool investments may not be as groundbreaking, it deserves equal attention. Up until the last 2 or 3 years, the shop had a “you get what you pay for” mentality that prevailed in new machine purchases. This led the shop to acquire mostly expensive machines, many of them from Japan. Although these machines are still highly regarded as very productive assets, the company has taken a different direction. For its most difficult turning applications in Inconel and other exotic alloys, Gentz has acquired a number of Taiwanese machines such as horizontal lathes and VMCs from Johnford and vertical lathes from You Ji. This change in thinking is largely due to the efforts of Absolute Machine Tools (Lorain, Ohio), the U.S. importer, and its distributor, Single Source Technologies. These machines both meet Gentz’s demanding performance criteria and represent “more machines for the money.” According to Roger Bartolemei, Gentz COO, turning to Taiwan-built machines allowed the shop to acquire both the capability and the capacity it needs to keep up with growing demand for its jet engine components.

AN OEM AND REPAIR JOB SHOP
Although Gentz’s approach to certain supplier relationships may be atypical, the shop stands out in other ways. It produces long runs of complex parts in low volumes. OEM products account for about 80 to 85 percent of its sales. Fifteen to 20 percent of sales is “overhaul” work—repairing, refurbishing and upgrading critical jet engine parts. Because an overhaul job often must be turned around immediately to get an aircraft back into the air, Gentz follows principles of “quick response manufacturing,” a variation of lean manufacturing techniques suitable for job shop environments. Machine tools are arranged in cells that are self-sufficient in completing a set of operations. Quick changeover, standardized tooling and visual manufacturing (keeping everything in sight and clearly marked for foolproof identification) are practiced throughout the shop areas.

The company has been evolving along these lines for years but has remained true to its roots as an aerospace shop job since its founding in 1949. The company’s current location in Warren is a short distance from its original site. Its most recent expansion, completed in December 2007, brought its total manufacturing space to about 132,000 square feet. Gentz has a growing workforce, too, which is nearing 300.

The company’s approach to manufacturing is truly comprehensive. Its engineers work with customers’ designers to improve not only the manufacturability of components but also their repairability. Gentz can develop repair and maintenance manuals as it is developing OEM production processes and provide repair packages with the delivery of the completed components. Production processes, however, do not remain fixed after start up. Thinking about ways to streamline operations and reduce costs begins right away.

A seeming paradox is that the company is at once both cautious and aggressive about attempts to improve its manufacturing processes. A component can represent tens of thousands of dollars in added value by the time it reaches a certain operation. If that operation is stable and predictable, the shop is understandably wary of changes that might disrupt the status quo. When the status quo represents a bottleneck, excessive cutter consumption, resistance to automation or other less-than-ideal performance levels from the machine, the shop actively seeks a better way.

This is one reason why interactions with machine tool suppliers and cutting tool manufacturers make a big difference for Gentz.

TOOLING FORUMS
The monthly “tooling forums” are a good example of how Gentz takes interactions with a supplier to a new and beneficial level. Attendees include Gentz personnel who represent the CNC programming, engineering and purchasing departments. Mr. Bartolomei and Jim Stevens, OEM manufacturing manager, are usually part of the Gentz team at these meetings, indicating the level of top management support for this process.

Belinda Smith, an application engineer for Seco, usually joins her counterpart from E & R Industrial at these meetings. When the idea for these forums first emerged a couple of years ago, the invitation to participate was extended to other cutting tool manufacturers whose products were in use at Gentz, but Seco was the only one to embrace the concept enthusiastically.

Meetings usually focus on a particular operation that needs attention. In essence, these forums give Gentz a chance to challenge the tooling supplier to find a better way to perform that operation. After identifying areas of concern or dissatisfaction, the group discusses options and alternatives before deciding on specific improvement projects to pursue. These projects are prioritized and added to the “action register,” a list of on-going projects that includes a start date, an anticipated completion date and notes about specific performance targets to meet. The action register is the chief outcome of each of the forums, which usually last about 90 minutes.

Often, Seco has developed new cutting grades, insert geometries or insert coatings in response to action register items. When these “Gentz specials” prove themselves on the shop floor, some are likely to become a standard item in the Seco catalog. Others are unique solutions to the unique difficulties imposed by the advanced designs of Gentz’s workpieces.

The Gentz team understands that cost concerns must focus on the cost of the cut, not the cost of the cutter. A specially designed tool is likely to cost more, sometimes considerably more, than a standard item. Part cost analysis helps make the value of a more costly insert or cutter assembly apparent and justifiable. Likewise, the team recognizes that it has to be open to concepts that challenge its notion of tooling practices. This may mean running a tool at speeds or feeds that cause some nervousness during trial cuts.

An early example of successful cooperation between Gentz and Seco involved a thread milling operation in an Inconel combustion casing. Based on input from the tooling supplier, the shop was able to save more than $60,000 a year by reducing the time to complete 52 threaded holes in each casing and eliminate hand tapping to finish each hole. When initially developing the production process for this part, the shop wanted to use a 0.156 inch thread mill. Unfortunately, mills of this size from other suppliers could not cut the threads to full size without breaking. As a result, the shop had to settle for using a larger thread mill that that was not as weak, taking three light passes in each hole and leaving the threads undersized. Manually tapping each hole to full size required an additional ninety minutes on average per casing.

Ms. Smith believed that the shop could still produce the holes to size with a 0.156 inch thread mill from Seco’s Threadmaster series. These solid carbide tools are designed with a micrograin carbide structure and a TiCN coating. However, other changes also had to be made. To optimize cutting conditions for this grade, feedrates would have to be doubled to 194 ipm and spindle speeds upped to 5,000 rpm (the most the machine could deliver). Switching to a heat-shrink toolholding system would also be necessary to minimize runout at these settings, she insisted. Even programming routines would have to be modified. Although the proposed changes seemed extreme at first, the logic of the systems approach was compelling. In tests, the new thread mill proved to have the strength and wear resistance to produce full-size threads in two passes instead of three.

Several lessons emerged from this experience. For one, it was essential to involve engineering, programming and the shop floor staff in the discussion. For another, it was important to consider not only the cutting tool, but also the toolholder, machining parameters and programming routines. Moreover, it was necessary to have a representative of the cutting tool manufacturer present for the machining trials to make sure that all recommendations were carried out fully and that test cuts were performed fairly.

RETHINKING VALUE
Although it’s never too late to improve an operation by developing a new tooling solution, it’s much tougher to overcome constraints or inefficiencies stemming from the limitations of a machine tool. Because Gentz thoroughly understands its workpieces, from design intent through maintenance and repair cycles, the company uses this insight to set forth requirements for new machines in no uncertain terms. Yet being flexible and pragmatic has served the shop well. The recent shift to “value-priced” machines from Taiwan, for example, is consistent with the company’s characteristic openness to change.

Lately, the shop has concentrated on boosting production of thin-walled housings and casings in high-temperature alloys such as Inconel 718, a material it encounters frequently. Demand for these parts has surged, especially now that Gentz has new contracts for the Pratt & Whitney 150 engine turbine housings. Typically, both the OD and the ID of these parts are characterized by complex contours and grooves with fine surface finish requirements. Some housings approach 40 inches in diameter and stand as tall as 30 inches. Most start out as forgings that may weigh as much as 3 or 4 times more than the finished part. After machining, walls may be as thin as 0.06 or 0.08 inch. Dimensional tolerance on diameters is typically 0.001 inch. The tolerances on the widths of intricate slots and grooves are often just as tight.

To meet the surging orders, Mr. Bartolomei initially wanted to stick with the customary turning centers. However, distributor Single Source Technologies directed him toward a Johnford ST model slantbed turning center that had the unusually large swing needed to handle the full range of casing diameters. Despite this, Mr. Bartolomei was hesitant. Shouldn’t we be considering the more expensive machines we’re used to, he wondered. In his mind, the rigidity, reliability and accuracy of these machines could be taken for granted.

Keith Kauzlarich, vice president sales at SST, knew that Gentz was uncompromising in its expectations for top quality machines backed by a high level of service and support. However, he could see that the Johnfords and other machines from Taiwan would be a good fit. For example,
the Johnford turning center had not only the exceptional swing that the shop was looking for, but also other characteristics that make it especially suitable for machining Inconel.

Chief of these is rigidity. The weight and size of its bed casting as well as the boxway construction on the axes would absorb vibrations from the forces involved in machining Inconel. (As a workpiece material, Inconel is both tough to machine and highly sensitive to vibrations, so it is prone to chatter.) The 60-hp spindle motor and large spindle bearings on this lathe would provide the power for these cuts, especially in roughing when high torque at low rpm is needed. Also, the 60-degree angle of the slant of the bed lets an operator get close to the parts in the work zone.

Steve Ortner, president of Absolute Machine Tools, believes that machines from this builder now hold an advantage over comparable models from Japan because Johnford did not follow the trend to lighter, low-mass designs favored by Japanese builders for high-speed machining applications. For example, he points out that the heavier Meehanite castings on these lathes provide the exceptional rigidity needed for cutting the tough aerospace alloys faced by Gentz.

In addition to conventional turning centers, Gentz also needed to expand its resources for vertical turning. However, the long lead times on its preferred choices ruled them out. Mr. Bartolomei was directed to VTL models from You Ji, another line from Taiwan imported by Absolute Machine Tools. As Mr. Ortner points out, these machines not only met the specifications, but were also very reliable products with proven track records in aerospace work. Moreover, the model sizes that Gentz was looking for were available from the factory with short delivery times.

One point that added to skepticism about the Taiwanese machines was price. Both brands were significantly less expensive than what Gentz was expecting to invest. This was a company that never went bargain hunting when it came to machine tool purchases. Skimping on manufacturing equipment was not its style and not the way to ensure quality work in the very demanding aerospace industry.

Ultimately, SST arranged to have the Gentz team meet at Absolute’s headquarters in Ohio for demonstrations of the Johnford and You Ji machines. Visits to customers in the area who had installed these brands in aerospace applications very similar to those at Gentz were also arranged. Both users were machining Inconel with great success. This was enough to convince the shop to go ahead with an order. The first two Johnford lathes were installed facing each other in a cell with an overhead crane in the middle to aid load and unloading. A similar cell with two You Ji VTLs was installed not long after.

According to Mr. Bartolomei, the machines performed so well that repeat orders for machines from both builders have followed. This includes a pair of Johnford SV-41H VMCs with four-axis rotary tables. Like almost all of the machines at Gentz, the new slantbeds, VTLs and VMCs are on duty 24 hours a day, 6 days a week. The reliability record for these machines has exceeded expectations, although it should be noted that Gentz has a disciplined preventive maintenance program in place as part of its lean manufacturing and continuous improvement efforts.

MANUFACTURING’S FUTURE
Gentz’s success in aerospace is seen as a model for the survival of manufacturing in southeastern Michigan. Many observers have witnessed the decline of the automotive factories in the area and the job losses that go along, only to conclude that manufacturing has no future in this region. Gentz clearly contradicts this outlook.

In addition to creating good paying jobs for a growing workforce within its own facilities, Gentz supports other manufacturing companies in the area when it needs one of the processes it does not currently provide in-house. It also supports local supplier companies such as Seco Tools and Single Source Technologies. However, everyone at Gentz understands that continued success is never guaranteed. The company has to renew is strength by challenging itself, by challenging its suppliers, and by keeping its customers strong as well.
http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/turning-the-tough-stuff.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Lathe | No Comments »

How To Machine Composites, Part 1 — Understanding Composites

November 28th 2008

The Boeing 787 will be the world’s first large commercial airplane made mostly of carbon-fiber composite materials. Composites make up 50 percent of the structural weight of the plane and something like 80 percent of the volume. By comparison, the Boeing 777 is just 11 percent composites by weight. Boeing is making a huge commitment to replacing metals with composites, and the economics of aircraft ownership explain why.

For an airplane, the initial purchase price does not account for the majority of the ultimate total cost of the plane. However, maintaining and fueling the airplane together do account for the majority of this cost, and composites bring down both of these expenses. Aircraft composite materials are inherently more fatigue-resistant and corrosion-resistant than metals, contributing to maintenance cost savings that could be as high as $30 to 40 million over the life of a 787. The composite structures also deliver a greater strength-to-weight ratio, contributing to fuel cost savings. It has been estimated that a 787 flying the same route as a 767 (a smaller plane) would consume $5 million less per year in fuel.

The total of these and other savings from composites comes somewhere near the price of the plane. That observation has been expressed this way: If the plane is made from composites, then you get the plane for free.

Yet the dramatic shift in materials for aircraft parts entails a similarly dramatic shift in the ways those parts are made. What implications does a mostly-composite commercial airplane have for manufacturing?

More specifically, what does this mean for machining?

A composite part is a near-net-shape part. The form is laid up onto a tool that is custom-made to give the part its shape. Compared to an aluminum aerostructure component, a composite part requires very little machining.

Then again, the machining that the composite part does require can be challenging indeed. By definition, composites are not homogenous the way metal is. A “composite” is a combination of two or more materials engineered to achieve better properties than either of the component materials could achieve on their own. In a composite, one material is the matrix and at least one other is the reinforcement. Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP), the chief composite material in aircraft parts, consists of a plastic matrix with carbon fiber reinforcement. The shop that tries to machine this combination material faces a combination of challenges. The matrix could melt from too much heat, while the carbon fibers don’t cut well because they fracture instead of shearing smoothly. Meanwhile, the CFRP structures are built up from layers of material that could easily splinter or delaminate during machining.

A final source of challenge is this: By the time the composite structure is ready for machining, it has already become such a valuable part that the cost of scrapping it may be enormous.

Therefore, as more composite parts come to market, a growing number of machine shops will face this reality: They will machine composite workpieces for which the amount of machining is small compared to a metal part, but the cost, difficulty, value and impact of that machining will be considerably higher.

It is not just Boeing driving this. Practically all aircraft manufacturers are increasingly turning to composites to replace certain metal components and assemblies. Helicopters have been mostly composites for a while now. In fact, manufacturers of various high-value products are increasingly looking to composites of one form or another to take advantage of their strength, stiffness, durability, corrosion resistance, wear resistance and light weight. One estimate says that in 10 years, there may be even more CFRP going into wind turbines than into all aircraft. Meanwhile, metal matrix composites are being applied to higher-performance automotive components such as brake rotors. And because composites can also be transparent to X-rays, they are likely to find many new medical applications as well.

However, the phrasing above—that industries are increasingly looking to composites “of one form or another”—hints at an important caveat when discussing this class of materials. That is, composites are not a unified class of materials at all.

For example, CFRP is a type of polymer reinforced plastic, of which there are many varieties. Other, similarly broad varieties of composites are metal matrix composites and ceramic matrix composites. The word “composite” actually refers to a broader range of materials than the word “metal” does.

Earl Wilkerson, a CNC programming and tooling supervisor, has faced various composites machining challenges as part of his work for General Tool, a 240-employee contract manufacturer in Cincinnati, Ohio. A composite, Mr. Wilkerson says, is “any two materials that someone wants to glue together.”

How do you know how to machine a composite material that you are facing for the first time? Quite likely, you don’t. That is part of the reality of these materials. General Tool is something of a composites machining expert at this point, having developed machining experience in aircraft composites early on. Thanks to the company’s work on an early jet engine that used composites, it has now been machining aerospace composite materials for over 15 years. Even so, every new composite part is still different to the shop.

In fact, every new CFRP part is different. The term “CFRP” itself is broad. After General Tool succeeded machining its first CFRP part, the company struggled with the second one, until it discovered that the parameters needed to be slowed down and the leftover stock on some features needed to increase. The properties and composition of the second CFRP were different from the first CFRP—and this is the way it has been with CFRP ever since.

“You can’t just go to a handbook and look up ‘composites’ to get the right tools, speeds and feeds,” Mr. Wilkerson says. You can’t even look up “CFRP.” None of these materials is defined or consistent enough for that.

However, there are some lessons that this shop and other shops have learned—lessons that have allowed them to consistently succeed at machining a class of materials that continues to grow and change. To proceed to the next article in this series, click here.
http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/how-to-machine-composites-part-1—-understanding-composites.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Machines | No Comments »

Alternate Tool Material For Hogging Large Workpieces

November 28th 2008

Attaining high metal-removal rates is a priority for many manufacturers, especially those serving the aerospace and moldmaking industries. Although carbide and high speed steel (HSS) cutting tools are popular for roughing applications on the large components common to such shops, both have disadvantages, notes Ivan Salazar, marketing manager for Santa Fe, California-based Precision Cutting Tools (PCT). He says roughing with carbide tools can be difficult because carbide can be somewhat brittle, chipping and breaking at high feeds and speeds. And while HSS is less prone to chipping, it can soften and wear at the high temperatures generated by heavy cuts, especially in applications involving titanium and other exotic alloys that have low heat-transfer rates.

PCT offers another alternative. Mr. Salazar says powder metal tools combine the best features of carbide and HSS. According to Mr. Salazar, powder metal can outperform both materials in rough-milling applications where the goal is to hog out as much metal as possible as quickly as possible.

Compared with HSS, powder metal provides higher heat and wear resistance, lasts longer and is only moderately more expensive, Mr. Salazar explains. Carbide, on the other hand, is harder than powder metal, making it the better choice for finishing applications in which the goal is to produce the smoothest possible surface. However, carbide’s extreme hardness makes it more susceptible to shock. Powder metal is more flexible, allowing users to run at higher feeds and speeds without worrying as much about breaking the tool. Additionally, powder metal tools are less expensive than their carbide counterparts, Mr. Salazar says.

Powder metal’s advantages stem primarily from the fact that its composition is designed to reach a fine balance between hardness (the material’s resistance to chipping or breakage) and toughness (the material’s resistance to gradual wear). Each tool consists of a soft matrix that acts like a glue to hold carbide cutting particles together, says Dave Reau, PCT’s quality control manager. Because the matrix is softer than the carbide particles, the volume of matrix versus the volume of carbide determines the tool’s hardness and toughness characteristics.

Powder metal tools are less brittle than their carbide counterparts because the matrix volume is greater than the carbide volume, while this relationship is reversed in most carbide tools, Mr. Reau notes. He says the tools are more wear-resistant than their HSS counterparts because the carbide particles are more uniformly distributed. This is beneficial because fractures can move through the tool more readily if the carbide particles are aligned, which is common in conventional HSS, he adds.

“Under a microscope, powder metal looks like sand—it mixes together quite finely.” Mr. Salazar explains. “Conventional HSS, on the other hand, looks like veins of wood. It’s not quite as compressed and not quite as homogenous.”

Powder metal tools can be used for workpieces ranging from aluminum mold cavities to large aerospace components made of titanium, Waspalloy, Hastalloy and other exotic alloys. Materials in the powder mixture are carefully proportioned according to each tool’s intended application. For example, PCT’s PM 30 and PM 60 series contain higher percentages of cobalt for machining hard materials, whereas the company’s PM 4 line includes more vanadium for aluminum workpieces.

http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/alternate-tool-material-for-hogging-large-workpieces.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Machines & CNC Tools | No Comments »

Economies Of Scale

November 27th 2008

Micro-machining expertise was not the reason why Protofab Inc. was able to diversify into medical implant machining work. The expertise came later.

Equipment was not the reason, either. This small shop in Petaluma, California, did not have sophisticated equipment for making tiny parts—at least not at first.

Instead, this job shop that was accustomed to other industries and bigger workpieces was able to expand into medical part production for a less obvious reason. The shop won the work and began to thrive at this work in large part because of a workholding strategy that made prototype parts—at any size—more economical.
A Learning “Wall”

Programmer Ferdinand Krall was one employee who spent significant time and effort on developing the shop’s micro-machining expertise. He jokes that the learning curve was so steep, it was more like a “learning wall”—an obstacle that had to be scaled instead of climbed.

The material was hardened 316 stainless steel. Mr. Krall broke tools and scrapped parts as he carefully learned the best ways for Protofab’s equipment to machine micro-size features in this material using tools such as 0.023-inch-diameter drills and 0.025-inch-diameter end mills. He says the machining techniques and cutting parameters that the shop applies to hard steel at conventional cutter sizes do not scale down.

Like the expertise, the micro-machining equipment came with time as well. When the implant work went into full production, the shop was able to invest in its most sophisticated machine tool to date, an SR-20 III CNC Swiss-type turning center from Star CNC Machine Tool Corporation.

Protofab president Mike Maendl says he is confident the shop will buy more machines just like this one as the medical machining portion of the shop’s business grows.

However, buying a CNC Swiss-type machine as a way to pursue the implant machining business would not have worked, he says. In doing this, the company would have overlooked the primary challenge of this work. The smallness of the parts is difficult enough, but at the outset, the smallness of the batch sizes and lead times presented the greater difficulty. Protofab’s customer—a medical device maker preparing to launch a new and specialized product—needed first to refine and prove its design through a rigorous prototyping process. That meant the customer was not looking for a shop that could machine large quantities quickly and inexpensively. The customer was instead looking for a shop that could machine these parts in small quantities quickly and inexpensively. What separated Protofab from other shops that bid on this work was its willingness to automate even for small quantities, and to pass along the savings from automation even during the pre-production stages of the work.
Horizontal To Vertical

Automating on short runs is routine for Protofab. On its horizontal machining center, the shop uses the indexing fourth axis to machine as many features of the part as it can in one cycle, and it uses carefully engineered tombstone fixturing to machine an entire family of related parts all at once.

On a vertical machining center, the shop does the same thing—using an add-on rotary indexer to reach angled features and to set up an entire family of parts for machining all at once. On the right jobs, applying the vertical in this way can allow it to serve as a “poor man’s horizontal,” Mr. Maendl says, achieving much of the same effectiveness as an HMC at a lower rate of cost to the customer.

Machining the complete family in one cycle on a low-cost VMC is how the shop produced the various prototype implant parts efficiently. In short, this workholding strategy was one practice that did scale down.
Getting To Micro

More typical work for Protofab includes parts at more conventional sizes—say, 1 or 2 square feet—for customers in the electronics and communications industries. Workholding innovation is often the key to meeting machining challenges. Some precise holding trays for a complex blood analysis machine (the shop’s first medical-related work) provide an example. The expansion of these parts during machining caused them to distort against the workholding clamps, leaving the machined features out of tolerance once the part was released. The shop solved this problem by creating a floating clamp (see photo below) that was free to shift slightly to accommodate the part’s expansion.

Protofab used the same kind of ingenuity to develop fixtures to hold and accurately locate the tiny implant parts. The indexer, combined with this workholding, provided both the ability to machine multiple angles in one cycle and the space to accommodate all of the fixturing for the entire family of parts in one setup.

With the workholding engineered and in place, all that remained for Protofab was to figure out how to machine at micro scales on a lower-cost machine.

It could be done. However, it turned out there was a lot to learn.
No One Can Hear You Crash

Down at 0.025 inch in diameter, you can’t easily see a tool break, says Mr. Krall. You can’t hear the tool cut. There is no feedback for the machinist until the part is removed from the setup. Only then does the machinist potentially discover that the part is out of tolerance, the burr is too big to remove quickly, or a piece of the cutting tool is still sticking out of the workpiece to testify that the tool did, in fact, break. After long hours of experimentation and more than a few frantic calls to the tool supplier after going through too many small tools too quickly, what follows is a taste of what Mr. Krall and Protofab have learned about machining effectively with tiny tools.

These lessons were learned during the prototype and pre-production machining—work that was performed on a machining center that was never intended to see such fine cutting. Some of the lessons (such as the speed) probably will not apply in full production, when the shop uses its new turning center. New lessons will come at that point, but Protofab expects this learning process to be much more of a graceful curve.

Mr. Krall says his first and perhaps most basic piece of advice is that machining at smaller scales requires a shop’s workbench to have a piece of equipment it probably does not have today—a microscope.

For inspection and deburring, Mr. Krall is peering through his microscope almost constantly as the implant work is being run.

A presetter becomes essential, too, he says. The tiny amounts of tool runout that the shop can live with on a 1-inch or 1/2-inch diameter tool become unacceptable at smaller scales, because that small value of runout becomes a huge percentage of the tool’s diameter. Without using a presetter to set tools precisely, tool breakage is practically guaranteed.

Here are other lessons the shop has learned:

The tool. On the low-cost VMC, a $2 micro tool made of high speed steel often works better at machining the hardened stainless steel implant parts than an $80 carbide tool engineered for high performance. That’s because the flexibility of the HSS tool is often essential to machining the feature in cases where the tool is subject to some small amount of play or imbalance in the process. The carbide tool facing less than optimal conditions is likely to break. Plus, the speed that the carbide tool can offer the shop is not important for such low volumes. The shop routinely runs the tiny tools not at the high spindle speed expected for small tools, but instead at 6,000 rpm. Cycle time is not what is important here, says Mr. Maendl. What is important is working out a process that reliably and precisely machines the feature.

The plan. Process planning is “tremendously important,” says Mr. Krall. The order in which machining operations are performed can determine whether those operations will succeed at all. One example involved a tiny hole drilled off-center into the OD of a cylindrical part. On a regular-sized part, the OD would be turned to size before holes were drilled into it. On this implant part, the shop left the extra OD stock in place so that it could mill a flat at the hole entry point. This allowed the drill to enter a perpendicular surface instead of a sloping curve. Before implementing this measure, the drill would deflect and break.

Deburring represents another significant reason for process planning. Deburring can actually be more costly and time-consuming than machining. When the VMC produces families of implant parts, it takes two operators performing deburring to keep up with the machine’s output. This is not a testimony to the machine’s speed, but instead a result of the difficulty of deburring down at tiny scales. A machining strategy that reduces deburring—for example, ramping the milling tool in and out of the cut to knock away most of the burr—can deliver significant time and cost saving to the process.

The machine. Protofab has demonstrated to itself and its customer that an expensive machine is not necessary for medical implant machining. In fact, when the part relates to a product under development that hasn’t earned any money for its sponsors yet, doing the work on an inexpensive machine may be essential. Part of the key is simply to know the machine well and know what it can do—and when the machine can do it. Mr. Krall says thermal drift of the machine can be ignored on almost all of the conventional-size work the shop does, but it becomes critical to manage the drift on the micro-machining work. The machining center has to be allowed to warm up for 45 minutes, he says. Then, for the next 2 to 3 hours, he checks parts frequently and makes repeated changes to CNC offsets to chase tolerances. This is simply the reality of using a machine such as this for fine work.

http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/economies-of-scale.aspx

Posted by admin under CNC Software | No Comments »

« Prev - Next »